原题∶The AG-IGP-tag-team fabricated evidence
作者∶拉惹柏特拉
发表日期∶01-07-2008
翻译∶ECS283
校对∶CC LIEW
总警察长和总检察长在1998年伪造证据，而今天他们必须偿还他们当年所干下的罪行。虽然这是10年前的事，但证据已经浮出水面。是的，就是如此，一位把这个秘密收藏了十年之久的吹哨者已经挺身而出。RPK签下了一份虚假的法定声明书。总警察长和总检察长都是这么说的。而且，因此，根据刑法203条文之下，一定要送RPK进牢。
好，没问题，我并不在意。不过，总警察长和总检察长必须做我牢房的邻居，而且还要呆得比我久。这是因为总警察长和总检察长在1998年，也就是10年前，伪造假证。这个罪行至少要判2年以上的。所以，当我进去蹲两年，总警察长和总检察长在我放监出来，坐在哈瓦那俱乐部里叹我的古巴雪茄的时候，应该还在牢里。
也许你们有些人搞不懂我在说什么。那就让我带你们去怀旧怀旧一番。
在1998年9月20日，安华被逮捕，然后被带到武吉阿曼的牢房。当时的总警察长，拉欣诺进入该牢房，就痛殴安华。在拉欣诺对安华施以老拳的时候，安华是被手铐着，还被蒙上眼睛的。
最近“退休了”的那个商业犯罪部总监，兰利尤索夫，也就是还在面对贪污指控的那个，在听到安华惨叫的时候，就即刻冲入牢房，把拉欣诺拉开，阻止他继续对安华施暴。
他们然后就离开牢房，任由还是被蒙住眼，铐着手，血流满面，不省人事的安华躺在牢房地上。兰利提议要把安华送去医院，可是拉欣诺反对。随后，拉欣诺要他们引用内安法令扣留安华，好让安华在接下来的60天之内，无法会见任何人，这样一来，被打的事情也无法为人得知了。
隔天早晨，兰利去看望安华的状况时，发觉他还是如昨晚离开他时一样，蒙眼，铐手，流血和不省人事。兰利再次尝试得到拉欣诺的同意，送安华进院。可是他的请求还是被拒了。兰利只好找一位医生来到武吉阿曼照料安华。
起初警察说安华自己打自己。甚至说安华在昏过去后还是继续自己打自己。这就是安华特别的地方了，昏迷时还能保持清醒。这种特质刚好和清醒时还能保持昏迷的阿都拉是相反的。
当政府发觉只有1% 的马来西亚人相信安华自己打自己，还在昏迷后自己打自己的事情之后，他们无法之下，只好下令做出调查。后来，调查的结果证明拉欣诺殴打安华，而且其它高级警官也在场目击这起事情。
无论如何，纵使在武吉阿曼内的所有人都知道发生了什么事，包括当时也在那里的现任总警察长和总检察长，却伪造了一份报告说，安华是被一名或多名不详人士所殴打。之后，当然，拉欣诺在发觉纸包不住火后，承认了有关罪行，然后被判入狱两个月。这个刑罚和偷一条香蕉的刑罚是一样的。（不过他们也在40天后放他出来了。）
总警察长和总检察长在1998年伪造证据，而今天他们必须偿还他们当年所干下的罪行。虽然这是10年前的事，但证据已经浮出水面。是的，就是如此，一位把这个秘密收藏了十年之久的吹哨者已经挺身而出。
就如我在2008年6月18日的法定声明书里所说: “我已可靠地被告知”，我那些吃法律饭的朋友，请注意这个新字眼∶我已可靠地被告知。而我已可靠地被告知，总警察长和总检察长在1998年伪造假证。
天啊，这哈瓦那雪茄实在是太好味道了……呼……
拿督斯里安华伊布拉欣的警方报案书全文
我，安华依布拉欣，在此根据我所得知的情报报案。
一、这份报案书与前全国总警长拉欣诺（Rahim Noor）在1998年9月20日致伤我一案有关。我相信拉欣诺被提控后认了罪。我已于1998年9月27日就该事报案。
二、有关这项致伤攻击的调查，我相信查案官助理警察总监莫再因（Mat Zain Ibrahim）已作行了透彻的调查，准备了一份调查报告（IP），并于1998年10月交给前总检察署莫达阿都拉与其团队，其中包括目前的总检察长阿都干尼（Abd Gani Patail），以采取进一步行动。
三、该调查书得出的结论是，拉欣诺是打伤我的人。这是在进行透彻的调查后才达致该结论，该报告还有我的医疗报告，由吉隆坡法医专家如阿都哈林（Ab. Halim Haji Mansar）医生、扎哈里医生（Zahari bin Noor）以及至少60个证人的证词。医疗报告的结论显示，我的伤患是殴打致成。
四、尽管已经有了调查报告和医疗报告，莫达在现任总监察长阿都干尼的协助下，寻求了另一位医生的协助，就我所知，该医生就是阿都拉曼尤索（Abdul Rahman Yusof）。
五、拉曼医生在一份未志期以及第二份志期2008年12月14日的法医报告，显示出“重塑案发现场”。我相信这就是所谓的重现一个从未发生任何事的案发现场。
六、毫无疑问的是，拉曼关于我被打伤的报告，并没有检查过我的身体。
七、虽然如此，尽管已有了调查报告与医疗报告，莫达在他于1999年1月5日的声明显示，在众多确实检查过我的医生，所作的报告中存在的所谓“矛盾”，莫达似乎接受了拉曼医生的报告。
八、莫达的文告也指出，调查进行后无法确认致伤我的人是谁。这与调查报告的说法有出入，该调查报告已于1998年10月证实，致伤我的人是拉欣诺。莫达和他的团队显然是故意误导公众。当莫再因的调查并没有作出结论时，公众要求设立一个皇家委员会，这个委员会最后也设立了。莫达也发表不正确的声明，指调查报告是在1998年11月19日呈交给他。我相信阿都干尼完全知道这份声明的内容是错误的。
九、我相信慕沙哈山（Musa Hassan）和阿都干尼都于1998年9月20日接到这份报告，并指导拉欣诺打伤我。慕沙哈山和阿都干尼接着隐瞒公众有关打伤我的事，直到我的黑眼圈显露出来。
十、我相信慕沙哈山和阿都干尼都积极地涉及（actively involve）获取拉曼医生第二份未志期的报告，并作出错误和难以置信的结论，如“致伤的方式和形态与直接的拳击不符”、“不排除乃意外致伤”以及“可能是自己致伤自己”等。他们指示拉曼医生继续撰写第二份报告，他们受到莫达阿都拉指示和/或合作。
十一、这项事实显示慕沙哈山、阿都干尼和莫再因（根据拉曼医生的第二份报告，陪同他到武吉阿曼我当时被扣留的牢房，并进行所谓的重塑案发现场）与拉曼医生合谋完成第二份报告。这么做是为了让我在1998年9月27日的报案书看起来是不正确的，这样我可以遭到提控，或至少诋毁我的公信力，只为了影响我的渎职和鸡奸案件的抗辩，以便能够将我定罪。
十二、在该案中，阿都干尼是协助莫达的资深主控官。慕沙哈山是查案官。我也相信是前所未有的做法，特别为了我的案件，在武吉阿曼设立了一间特别的行动室，以便他们能定期会面。
十三、这已经不是第一次出现有关阿都干尼捏造证据的指控。我得知，联邦法院在裁决再努扎卡里亚（Zainur bin Zakaria）对垒主控官的案件时，法官沈立强的判词写道“...根据表面证据，他不是投诉阿都干尼在1998年10月2日会议中，尝试要纳拉（Nalla）捏造证据以便使他的鸡奸案成功入罪？”句子中的他，指的是我。
十四、有关以上种种，我认为以下的文件可协助警方：
1. 莫达1999年1月5日发表的文告。
2. 皇家调查委员会针对拉曼医生的听证会记录。
3. 在皇家调查委员会报告中第二份由拉曼医生撰写的未志期报告。
十五、我要求警方针对此案捏造证据一事展开新的调查。我得知这触犯了《刑事法典》第192条款，一旦罪成可高达七年监禁。我要求对所有涉及制造拉曼医生第二份报告的人士，如阿都干尼、慕沙哈山、拉曼医生及莫再因等，展开彻底的调查，以便真相大白，而犯法者得以绳之以法。
安华伊布拉欣书
２００８年７月１日
4. The Police investigation file was submitted to me, as the Public Prosecutor of Malaysia, on 19.11.1998. The file contains, among other things, statements recorded under section 112 of the Criminal Procedure Code from 67 witnesses, namely, the Complainant himself, 3 doctors who had examined the Complainant and 63 members of the Police Force involved in the operations to arrest the Complainant at his house and his detention at Bukit Amah.
5. I have scrutinized all such statements and examined all evidence, including the following reports of medical experts:
(a) Report on medical examinations by Dr. Abdul Halim bin Haji. Mansar and Dr. Zahari bin Noor from the Forensic. Division of the Department of Pathology, Kuala Lumpur Hospital after this referred to as the "Forensic Report");
(b) Report on medical examinations by the following panel of doctors:
(i) Professor Dr. Anuar Zaini bin Md. Lain, of the University Hospital;
(ii) Associate Professor Eh:. David S.K. Choon, of the University Hospital;
(iii) Dato' Dr.(Mrs.)Kew Siang Tong, of the Kuala Lumpur Hospital;
(iv) Dato' Dr. Muhd. Borhan Tan, of the Kuala Lumpur Hospital,(after this referred to as the "Report of the Panel of Doctors");
(c) Medical Report by Dato' Dr. Haji Ahmad Shukri bin Mohamed (after this referred to as the "Ophthelmologist's Report".
6. On 1.12.98 I appointed Dr. Abdul Rahman bin Yusuf, Consultant Forensic Medical Examiner, Kuala Lumpur Hospital, to assist me in studying from forensic aspects the Complainant's allegations and the injuries found on his person as set out in the medical reports and statements of the various doctors. Dr. Abdul Rahman bin Yusuf
submitted his Special Report to me on 21.12.98.
7 In my view the Police investigation file submitted to me is not complete to enable me to make a final decision on this case. That being the situation, I directed the Special Investigation Team on 30-12.98 to complete its investigation by recording statements from the following senior police officers whose statements have not yet
been recorded:
(a) Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Noor, Inspector General of Police;
(b) Tan Sri Norian bin Mai, Deputy Inspector General of Police;
(c) Dato' Mohd. Ghazali @ Fauzi bin Yacub, Director of Internal Security and Public Order;
(d) Dato' Mohd. Jamil bin Johari, Director of Management, Bukit Aman;
(e) Dato' Yaacob bin Mohd. Amin, Director of the Criminal Investigations Department, Bukit Aman;
(f) Dato' Mohd. Yusof bin Abdul Rahnan, Director of the Special Branch, Bukit Aman;
(g) Dato' Kamaruddin bin Ali,Chief Police Officer, Kuala Lumpur;
(h) Dato' Ramli bin Yusoff, Deputy Director of the Criminal Investigation Department, Bukit Aman;
(i) Dato' Meor Chek Hussien bin Mahayuddin, Commander of Police Special Force, Bukit Aman.
8. I have also directed the Special InvestigatiOn Team to record statements from the various doctors as, after scrutinizing the Report of the Panel of Doctors and the Ophthalmologist's Report, I find that the Forensic Report is not comprehensive and is inconsistent with both the former Reports on several important aspects The Special Report of Dr. Abdul Rahman bin Yusuf also, among other things, touches on these inconsistencies. Further explanation from the relevant doctors are therefore necessary. In view of the fact that the Special Investigation Team has not completed its investigation, it is not appropriate at this juncture to disclose any of the medical reports connected to this case.
9. As I have stated earlier, Police investigation in this case has not been completed. From the evidence obtained so far, a prima facie case has not yet been disclosed to enable the institution of prosecution under section 323 of the Penal Code against any person for causing hurt to the Complainant or for abetting the commission of such offence. The Report of the Panel of Doctors shows that there were several injuries suffered by the Complainant before his arrest by the Police. Based on the medical reports and the investigation file of the Special Investigation Team as a whole, I am satisfied that several injuries alleged by the Complainant are not true, while there are injuries on certain parts of his body which are proved to have been caused by police officers whilst he was in police custody. I am also of the opinion that the Royal Malaysian Police is fully responsible for the injuries to the Complainant whilst he was in the legal custody of the Police. Nevertheless, the investigation which have been carried out so far have not identified the person or persons responsible for such injuries.
10. After further investigation has been fully carried out, if there is prima facie evidence, I as Public Prosecutor will not hesitate to consent to the institution of prosecution against any individual proved to have committed or abetted the commission of such offence.
(TAN SRI DATUK SERI MOHTAR BIN ABDULLAH)
Attorney General
Malaysia.
************************
(B) The Medical Evidence
4.10 We now come to the evidence of the Doctors who saw and treated DSA. Their written reports have been put into evidence and are listed under Appendix F at page 105. We need to make a special reference to the testimony of Dr. Halim Mansar before us when he said that all the injuries he found on DSA were "potentially lethal." This was misunderstood by some quarters to mean that the injuries were all such that by themselves they were sufficient to cause death, or were designed to cause death. The record must be put straight. With the greatest respect to Dr. Halim his command of the English Language was far from perfect. When asked to clarify what he meant by "lethal" he said that it meant "dangerous" or "very dangerous" in medical circles. He said DSA was lucky to be alive because blows to the neck could kill. What he did not say and what he must not be understood to have said was that the blows which were actually inflicted were lethal merely because they had been struck in a lethal area.
4.11 So far as the testimony of Dr Abdul Rahman bin Yusof is concerned, the Commissioners have noted that he did not personally see DSA or talk to him. The Attorney General's Chambers furnished him with the Police report of DSA, his statement to ACP Mat Zain and the medical reports of the other Doctors aforesaid and asked him to comment on them. (There are disturbing issues of patient - doctor's privilege of confidence here, which we do not propose to go into. It is distressing to note that with the possible exception of Dr. Shukri's report, DSA was not given access to the reports of the other doctors who examined him until they were made available at our hearing.) Dr. Abdul Rahman put up one report for the A.G.'s Chambers on the 2nd October 1998 and a second report (Exhibit A-9) which is not dated. We have looked at both these reports. In the light of his sworn testimony before us, that all the injuries referred to by DSA in his police report and in his police statement were consistent with his claim that he was punched and slapped, and that those injuries were also consistent with the opinion of the other Doctors whose reports had been furnished to him, we did not need to trouble Dr Abdul Rahrnan any further.
4.12 The reports of these other doctors were all available by early October 1998. In other words, there was a preponderance of independent evidence by that time that DSA's injuries were not self-inflicted and, as had already been claimed in his police report, that these injuries were the work ora single assailant.
4.13 The admission by TPT on the 28th February 1999 that it was TSRN who had assaulted DSA on the 20th September 1998, made any further enquiry into the identity of the assailant redundant. The unanswered questions now were how and why it happened.
******************************************
Notes Of Evidence
W13 - Dr Abdul Rahman
W.13 Dr Abdul Rahman bin Yusof (1st March 1999)
a/s English
46 years
Consultant in Forensic Medicine
Hospital Kuala Lumpur
Kuala Lumpur.
In answer to question by Tan Sri Abu Talib:
On the 1st December 1998, I was requested by the Hon. Attorney General to assist him in reviewing the various medical reports in respect of Dato' Seri Anwar. I was then called to see him at his office on the 5m December.
I was provided with the following documents:
i) The Police report of Dato' Seri Anwar labelled "G1".
ii) The statement by Dato' Seri Anwar labelled "A1".
iii) Medical Report from Dr Shukri "D19".
iv) Dr Shukri's statement "A44".
v) Statement from Dr. Vasantha.
vi) Medical report from Medical Panel of Doctors "G37".
vii) Three sets of photographs "D22", "D24" and D"26".
I did not examine Dato' Seri Anwar nor did I have any discussions with the doctors whose reports I was asked to review.
I agree that various factors such as the force applied, the distance between the assailant and victim, and the angle at which he is hit, can affect the pattern and nature of any injury.
Based on my review of the materials supplied to me I am of the opinion that the injuries as indicated in the various medical reports are consistent with Dato' Seri Anwar's claim that he was punched and slapped.
I also do not dispute the opinions expressed by the various doctors in their reports. I submitted a report to the Hon. Attorney General and I will tender a copy to the Commission after this.
X.X.D. by Mr. Teh:
Various factors affect the time taken for the blood to seep down from the forehead to cause the 'black eye'. This can take a few hours or it may be delayed for one or two days or even more. It is a gradual process.
Any blunt trauma or impact could have produced the injuries.
Mr. Karpal : No question.
Dato' Karo : No question.
En. Yusof : No question.
(Witness is released)
没有评论:
发表评论